Making Sense of Smartphone Processors: The Mobile CPU/GPU Guide
Smartphone manufacturers these days boast of their phones’ computer-like capabilities, from desktop-like internet browsing to HD video playback. They toss around spec sheets filled with processor names like ARM11, Cortex A8, Snapdragon, Tegra, OMAP, Armada, and more. What do these all mean, and how do the various chips compare? That’s what we’re going to take a look at today.
Over the last few months, the smartphone industry has seen an unpredecented focus on processing hardware. For example, Apple’s June 8, 2009 launch of the iPhone 3GS focused primarily on new hardware features, and that too, mostly on its processors, rather than major sensor upgrades (a 3.2 MP AF camera and digital compass aside). The 3GS was touted as consistently offering more than twice the performance of the first- and second-generation iPhones, yet offering the same or better battery life.
Similarly, Toshiba’s TG01, HTC’s HD2, and HTC’s Google Nexus One were launched with much fanfare, with their key feature being a 1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor that was also claimed to provide a major performance boost. Separately, Windows Mobile giant HTC found itself in the midst of a great controversy over missing drivers for hardware graphics acceleration, along with slow general performance, in the platform it uses in much its lineup today, the Qualcomm MSM72xx series.
Much speculation and excitement surrounds new smartphones featuring processors like Qualcomm’s Snapdragon, Nvidia Tegra/Tegra 2, TI OMAP 3/4, and various other implementations of ARM Cortex A8/A9. Most people who have heard of these mobile platforms or have seen various demo videos simply know that they are faster than what’s found in smartphones today. But what exactly is Tegra, and how does it compare to Snapdragon or to today’s mobile processors?
We’ll first go through each of the major processor families around in phones today, and then we’ll analyze them. To keep it readable, we we’ll go over differences in the processor architectures without drowning in excessive technical detail.
Inside the Smartphone
Our story starts with the desktop PC, because smartphones are essentially pocket-sized computers that have a few extra radios and operate in extremely confined conditions vis-a-vis power consumption, heat output, etc. A PC consists primarily of a motherboard chipset (typically split into a “Northbridge” that connects to the processor and memory (Intel’s P45, for example), and a “Southbridge” that connects to various peripheral buses, like PCI-Express, USB, etc. (Intel’s ICH10R, for example)), a central processing unit (CPU– Intel’s Core 2 Duo, for example), application memory (RAM), permanent storage (hard drive or solid-state disk), a graphics processing unit (GPU– ATI’s Radeon HD5890, for example), a power supply, and several peripherals connected to the PCI or PCI-Express buses (a built-in sound chipset or an add-on Wi-Fi card, for example).
Smartphones also have all of these components, except with much more integration — a few main chips can often encompass the CPU, GPU, other specialized coprocessors, motherboard buses, memory controller, LCD controller, sound chipset, CMOS camera interface, on-board memory, and several peripheral devices (such as Cell, Wifi, and Bluetooth radios). The “applications processor” is the chip responsible for general processing (something like a CPU + motherboard chipset) and may have several other functions built into it. The “baseband processor” is responsible for cellular wireless communications.
Where’s my quad-core iPhone with water cooling?
So if smartphones are so similar to PCs, then why don’t we see, say, an x86 CPU like Core 2 Duo in a smartphone today? The answer is that Core 2 Duo simply consumes far too much power and produces far too much heat than is acceptable in a phone. A typical desktop Core 2 Duo CPU can consume up to 65W and requires an active cooling system to keep it from overheating. Even Intel’s Atom chip consumes 4W (peak TDP), while entire cellphones must often fit in sub-1W power budgets.
Enter ARM, a mobile processor architecture that dominates high-end mobile phones and embedded devices like network routers. In its lowest power state, an Atom processor can consume about 100 mW, compared to 1 mW for some ARM chips. Intel is working on smaller, cooler-running, and more power-efficient versions of Atom (see Intel codename Penwell) that may finally bring x86 (and thus compatibility with desktop OSes and applications) to mobile phones in a few years, but for now, ARM is king on mobile, and all of the processors we’ll be looking at below are based on ARM instruction sets.
The World of ARM
If all smartphones today use ARM chips, why are some much faster and more expensive than others? ARM operates quite differently from Intel, it turns out. Whereas Intel designs and builds all of its own processors, ARM instead creates instruction sets — any CPU following them will be able to run ARM-compatible code. It also creates reference designs for processors that fit their instruction sets, which allows companies to easily produce their own chipsets around ARM’s core designs.
Some companies, like Nvidia, Samsung, and Texas Instruments simply license and adopt the ARM CPU reference design, whereas others, like Qualcomm and Marvell, license only the instruction set and create their own processors to fit them.
ARM’s most recent instruction set is version 7, and the first ARMv7 reference design was Cortex A8, whose architecture is found in today’s high-end smartphones. Lower-end smartphones today tend to use ARM11 chips, which implement the ARMv6 instruction set.
Smartphone chipsets use different approaches to integration. One of the key selling points of Nvidia’s Tegra chipset, for instance, is that its applications processor has several small, specialized processors built into it, each meant for particular tasks. Many chipsets are made this way, but Tegra has more dedicated co-processors than most. While Nvidia has used a somewhat deceptive marketing technique of calling Tegra a 7-core processor (it only has one general-purpose ARM11 processor), this approach does give two advantages. First, since dedicated processors are handling a number of tasks, the general-purpose core is freed up to handle user tasks. More importantly, Nvidia has designed Tegra to aggressively cut power consumption by turning off parts of the processor that aren’t being used. For instance, if a Zune HD is playing music with its screen off, why power anything but the audio processor and whatever’s needed to get the song file from storage?
Performance-wise, the first-generation Tegra is a bit of a mixed bag. As we’ll see below, its graphics performance is top-notch, exceeding that of any smartphone on the market. Yet its general performance is held back by the aging, single ARM11 CPU at 600 MHz. While Tegra’s specialized hardware and ability to aggressively manage power consumption by cutting power to coprocessors means that it’s well-suited to a media player like Microsoft’s Zune HD, it’s not great for smartphones, which tend to need general processing power more than multimedia capabilities. Nvidia did show faster versions of Tegra, intended for devices larger than smartphones, but the APX2500 chip in the Zune HD is the only one that actually ever shipped.
Tegra 2 solves most of the first-gen chip’s problems. Equipped with a dual-core ARM Cortex A9 CPU, it’s at least four times faster than Tegra 1 for general processing. GPU performance is said to be about twice as fast too, while power consumption remains similar. Nvidia has a solid all-around platform this time, but questions remain as to whether it’ll be able to produce enough chips to feed smartphone makers. Also, Tegra still does not integrate a radio chipset, which could put it at a competitive disadvantage for smartphones as compared to, say, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips, which have the radio basebands built-in.
Mobile CPU Overview
We’ve compiled an overview of most of the major mobile processor families on the market today (chips that have not yet shipped in production are italicized):
ARM vs. Intel
Laptops began to outsell desktop PCs some time ago, and mobile phones are among the most ubiquitous devices around. Smartphones are now pushing outwards in two directions: on one hand, they’re trickling downwards in price, replacing high-end featurephones near the $100 mark, and on the other, they’re pushing upward into the territory of Intel Atom-powered netbooks or mobile internet devices (MIDs). After all, if people use netbooks primarily for browsing the internet, checking email, and watching online videos, then what separates netbooks from high-end smartphones besides screen size?
It should be interesting to watch Intel compete with the whole array of ARM licensees in the coming years. Over 2 billion ARM chips are shipped every year– orders of magnitude greater than Intel’s Atom shipments. Intel’s betting that a shrunken Atom will give it power consumption comparable to ARM’s offerings yet greater processing power and most significantly, the x86 architecture (meaning compatibility with existing desktop applications and PC OSes like Windows XP/7).
Halo in Your Pocket? 3D Hits Mobile
Next, we’ll take a look at mobile graphics processing units (GPUs). The role of a GPU is primarily to provide hardware acceleration for 3D graphics applications like games, CAD, etc., but in recent years, it has also become responsible for drawing the main user interface in desktop OSes (more on that later). First up, a comparison of current and upcoming mobile GPUs, with some non-mobile chips tossed in for reference:
Why is the GPU relevant if I’m not playing games on my phone?
On most modern smartphone platforms (iPhone OS, Android, Palm WebOS, with Windows Mobile as a notable exception), the OS’ user interface itself is composited, meaning it is rendered by the GPU. This makes the interface feel a lot smoother than doing UI display calculations on the already resource-constrained CPU.
On the desktop, Mac OS X introduced many consumers to a GPU-composited desktop, and on the PC side, Windows Vista/7′s Aero interface provides similar functionality. Windows XP, even on a very fast desktop rig, generally never feels quite as smooth while, say, moving around windows, as Windows 7 or Vista running Aero. For the same reason, Windows Mobile 6.x, which uses a similar rendering mode (GDI) as XP and lacks a GPU-composited desktop, is going to feel laggy or rough compared to GPU-composited UIs.
More coming soon…
- Microsoft: Windows 8 will support ARM processors
- iPad internals revealed: it’s a higher-clocked iPhone 3GS
- Qualcomm ships dual-core 1.2 GHz Snapdragon CPU for smartphones
- Project Denver: Windows 8 on Nvidia CPUs, Intel in the Crosshairs
- Intel, Nokia to reveal “Penwell” Atom-based smartphone platform at MWC?
|Print article||This entry was posted by admin on March 14, 2010 at 4:01 pm, and is filed under Mobile, Technology. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.|
- Verizon Blackberry Curve 8330 Broadband Smartphone Review | Cell Phone Choice
- Nintendo Ds: Hand-held Gaming Console | Thief 3
- » Nintendo Ds: Hand-held Gaming Console | Thief 3
- Windows Phone 7 Series Minimum Hardware Requirements | TechAutos
- McLaren Unveils MP4-12C: 600 HP V8, 1.6 GHz Atom, Microsoft-Powered | TechAutos
- ASUS EEEPC 900HDB-RED001X,Red Netbook,XP Home os,with Webcam | Thief 3
- Windows Phone 7 Series Back Story: The Sleeping Giant Awakes, Reboots Windows Mobile
- uberVU – social comments
- Apple’s new iPhone 4: A4 CPU, HD video, high-res screen, video chat, 3-axis gyro for $199/299, June 24
- GSM und es kommt noch schlimmer – Trivadis Security Team Blog
- Smart Phones – The New Future of Computers | Corrupt Coding
- Intel Vs ARM « rocketscientists
- Smartphone and e-pads | Scientific Market
- الهاتف المحمول – الخليوي | Scientific Market
Typing eight characters crashes nearly every app in Mac OS X Mountain Lion – even the Crash Reporter
about 3 months ago - 1913No commentsTyping+eight+characters+crashes+nearly+every+app+in+Mac+OS+X+Mountain+Lion+-+even+the+Crash+Reporter2013-02-03+07%3A43%3A00adminhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.techautos.com%2F%3Fp%3D1913
A pretty embarrassing bug has surfaced in Apple’s latest version of Mac OS X, 10.8.2 Mountain Lion: typing “File:///” (without quotes) into nearly any app’s text fields causes the app to crash. A report filed on Open Radar, the open-source community bug tracker for Apple products, details the problem, which appears to be related to OS More >
HTC just announced its new One X superphone at the Mobile World Congress 2012 in Barcelona. The Android-powered handset features HTC’s first quad-core processor, a quad-core Nvidia Tegra 3 running at 1.5 GHz. Other specs include a 4.7″ Super LCD screen with 1280×720 HD resolution, 32 GB storage, 1 GB RAM, an 8-megapixel camera with More >
A YouTube video posted by the Dark Force Team (DFT), a well-known smartphone hacking group, shows Windows Mobile 6.1 running within WML — some sort of emulator — on an HTC Windows Phone 7.5 handset. The old OS shows up just like an app, so you can use Windows Phone 7′s task switcher to switch More >
Steve Jobs, Apple’s co-founder and former CEO, has died at the age of 56. Jobs had been diagnosed with an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor (a rare type of pancreatic cancer), and despite a liver transplant in April 2009, his health continued to deteriorate. Jobs’ vision and passion drove Apple to great heights and will certainly More >
Many expected Apple to launch a redesigned iPhone 5 at its phone event earlier today, but the company instead announced the iPhone 4S, an upgraded iPhone 4 that includes: Dual-core Apple A5 processor (ARM Cortex A9) Both HSDPA and CDMA radios built in (instead of separate variants, as in the iPhone 4) 8 MP camera More >
Major news in Cupertino this evening– Steve Jobs has resigned as CEO of Apple, citing health reasons. He will remain Chairman, while COO Tim Cook will take over CEO duty. The company’s press release states “Steve’s extraordinary vision and leadership saved Apple and guided it to its position as the world’s most innovative and valuable More >
Just a year after it bought Palm for $1.2 billion, HP has given up and is discontinuing all webOS phones and tablets, including the Pre and TouchPad devices. The strategic turnaround is mentioned in the “other announcements” section of a press release saying HP may spin off its whole Personal Systems Group (PCs, mobile More >
HP bought Palm last year, and while the company did launch the Pre 2, a moderately updated Pre, a few months later, today we’re seeing the first real fruits of the acquisition. HP just wrapped up its “Think Beyond” event in San Francisco, and the big picture is that it sees WebOS — admittedly an More >
Nokia’s new CEO Stephen Elop, formerly of Microsoft, just sent out a fairly devastating internal memo to all Nokia employees. It’s a brutally honest portrayal of the mess the company is in and an interesting example of how to kickstart a company that on the surface appears to be doing fine (positive growth, still the More >
Vying for the title of the most customizable smartphone ever made, HTC’s legendary HD2 can now triple-boot Windows Phone 7, Android, and Windows Mobile 6.5, courtesy to posters at XDA-Developers. The 4.3″ phone, grandfather of HTC’s current large phones, has similar specs to today’s high-end smartphones (1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon, 512 MB RAM) and runs all More >